The US Department of Education has clarified that guidance it released earlier this year on third-party service providers will not have the impact on study abroad and international student recruitment that the sector had feared.
On April 11, authorities issued a new statement detailing that the Dear Colleague Letter, released , exempts study abroad programs and international recruitment.
The department that it does not consider contracts with a number of third-party servicers to be relationships that the guidance impacts.
These include those working in study abroad programs, recruitment of foreign students not eligible for Title IV aid, certain clinical or externship opportunities, high school and local education agency dual or concurrent enrolment programs and local police departments.
It also added that it will identify any other services that fall into the category as it reviews comments it has received. In a call for public comment, the department received some , which it described as “significant and helpful feedback”.
The department also said it intends to remove the provision on foreign ownership of a third-party servicer.
Based on the comments received, it said the “number and breadth of servicers with at least some level of foreign ownership has expanded in the context of a changing higher education marketplace where institutions are adopting increasing numbers of technology-based solutions”.
“We believe the issue is more appropriately considered through negotiated rulemaking,” the department said in its updated statement.
It added that it will “carefully review public comments on areas of confusion or concern and consider clarifying and narrowing the scope of the guidance in several areas, including software and computer services, student retention, and instructional content”.
The September 1 effective date for the guidance will also be delayed, it added. Institutions and companies will have at least six months to make any changes required once the revised final guidance letter is published.
NASFA said it is reviewing the changes included in the updated guidance and it “will continue to work with partners to advocate for clarity and policies that support international education”.
The organisation’s executive director and CEO Fanta Aw is also taking part in a three-day virtual public hearing on April 12 where she will “commend the changes and urge the department to continue to engage with partners in the higher education and international education sectors as is works to revise and finalize TPS guidance”.
NAFSA was one of a handful of organisations leading the charge against the new guidance, which it said created “great uncertainty” for US higher education.
There were fears that the guidance would “end nearly all current study abroad programming”, as well as damage US institutions which stakeholders feared would not be permitted to use international recruiters to enrol international students.
While stakeholders responded with relief, vice provost for Global Affairs at University of Massachusetts Amherst, Kalpen Trivedi, , “I’m glad we prevailed but what a colossal waste of time and resources across the field”.
“Good News!” chairman of AIFS, William Gertz, . “Our advocacy efforts yield a positive result.”
The post appeared first on .
On April 11, authorities issued a new statement detailing that the Dear Colleague Letter, released , exempts study abroad programs and international recruitment.
The department that it does not consider contracts with a number of third-party servicers to be relationships that the guidance impacts.
These include those working in study abroad programs, recruitment of foreign students not eligible for Title IV aid, certain clinical or externship opportunities, high school and local education agency dual or concurrent enrolment programs and local police departments.
It also added that it will identify any other services that fall into the category as it reviews comments it has received. In a call for public comment, the department received some , which it described as “significant and helpful feedback”.
The department also said it intends to remove the provision on foreign ownership of a third-party servicer.
Based on the comments received, it said the “number and breadth of servicers with at least some level of foreign ownership has expanded in the context of a changing higher education marketplace where institutions are adopting increasing numbers of technology-based solutions”.
“We believe the issue is more appropriately considered through negotiated rulemaking,” the department said in its updated statement.
It added that it will “carefully review public comments on areas of confusion or concern and consider clarifying and narrowing the scope of the guidance in several areas, including software and computer services, student retention, and instructional content”.
The September 1 effective date for the guidance will also be delayed, it added. Institutions and companies will have at least six months to make any changes required once the revised final guidance letter is published.
NASFA said it is reviewing the changes included in the updated guidance and it “will continue to work with partners to advocate for clarity and policies that support international education”.
The organisation’s executive director and CEO Fanta Aw is also taking part in a three-day virtual public hearing on April 12 where she will “commend the changes and urge the department to continue to engage with partners in the higher education and international education sectors as is works to revise and finalize TPS guidance”.
NAFSA was one of a handful of organisations leading the charge against the new guidance, which it said created “great uncertainty” for US higher education.
There were fears that the guidance would “end nearly all current study abroad programming”, as well as damage US institutions which stakeholders feared would not be permitted to use international recruiters to enrol international students.
While stakeholders responded with relief, vice provost for Global Affairs at University of Massachusetts Amherst, Kalpen Trivedi, , “I’m glad we prevailed but what a colossal waste of time and resources across the field”.
“Good News!” chairman of AIFS, William Gertz, . “Our advocacy efforts yield a positive result.”
The post appeared first on .