Muslim parties move to Supreme Court for allowing Wuzu during Ramzan at Gyanvapi mosque

Educator

New member
gyanvapi mosque


The Supreme Court has been approached by the muslim parties in the pleas concerning the Gyanvapi – Kashi Vishwanath dispute, for asking permission for ablution inside the Mosque premises during Ramadan.

The issue was mentioned before a bench of Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud by Senior Advocate Huzefa Ahmadi on Thursday who agreed to list the case on April 14.

The Wuzu area of the Gyanvapi mosque is the centre of the contention since the Hindu parties claim that a Shivling has been found in that spot, with muslims believe is a fountain.

The Gyanvapi dispute began soon after the Hindu devotees approached a civil court claiming the right to worship inside the premises of the Gyanvapi Mosque, on the premise that it was a Hindu temple and still houses Hindu deities.

A survey of the mosque was ordered by the civil court under an advocate commissioner. The advocate commissioner then conducted the videographed survey and submitted a report to the civil court.

The Hindu parties on the basis of the survey claimed that one of the objects discovered at the site is a Shivling while the Muslim parties have disputed the same and said that it is only a water fountain.

The suit before the civil court then was transferred to the District Judge by the Supreme Court on May 20 in view of the sensitivity of the issue involved.

The District Court, held that the suit was not barred under the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991.

A Varanasi court found that the suit filed by Hindu parties seeking possessory rights over Gyanvapi Mosque maintainable.

This decision was appealed before the High Court by the by Committee of Management of Anjuman Intezamia Masjid which reserved its verdict in December.

The High Court had lately asked the Director General of ASI to submit his opinion on whether carbon dating, Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), excavation and other methods to determine the age of the disputed object at Gyanvapi mosque, would damage the object.

The District Court,held that the suit was not barred under the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991.

The post appeared first on .
 
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock