On Monday, the federal government
the application fee for international student visas. The move is effective immediately and sees the non-refundable fee jump from A$710 to $1,600.
The surprise news comes as part of a broader effort to rein in , especially among international students.
As Home Affairs Minister Clare O'Neil , the increased fee will make the migration system “fairer [and] smaller”. Education Minister Jason Clare the fee increases would also fund “important reforms” such as payments for compulsory work experience and free preparation courses for university.
The fee increase means Australia will have student visa application costs way above some of its competitor countries in the international education market.
For example, student visa fees are approximately US$185 (A$277) for the and about C$150 (A$164) for . For the , it is £490 (A$932) and for it is NZD$375 (A$343).
The move has been met with dismay from the university sector. , representing Australia’s top research universities (including The University of Sydney and The University of Melbourne), described it as a “blatant revenue raising move” and a “massive hit” to the A$48 billion sector.
Given the A$1,600 fee is not refundable, it may lower the pool of genuine applicants to study in Australia. This could particularly mean less students from developing countries and less cultural diversity on campuses.
It builds on other recent policy changes, including increased English language and savings requirements to study in Australia. As well as on the number of international students overall.
This has sparked concerns from groups such as that the sector is poised to suffer big financial losses, given the extent to which it relies on international student fees.
The government has been clear it believes international students have returned after the reopening of borders.
After the pandemic, the former Morrison government implemented a to encourage the return of international students. These included longer visas and greater work rights.
But these policies have now been changed. As the chart below shows, visa grant rates are at record lows. This means the government is refusing more international student applications than ever before.
This is especially the case in the vocational education and training sector. According to a , this was identified as having the highest number “ ” providers. So-called “ ” enrol students who have no real intention of studying and come to Australia in order to work.
The government’s aim to manage migration levels is to a certain extent understandable, particularly in the context of a tight housing market.
But given applications are being refused and there is an overall cap being planned, the fee increase feels like a blunt measure.
It also comes off the back of about Albanese government changes to student visas, such as “risk ratings” for institutions. The argument is, migration integrity measures are being used to drive down overall student numbers, which is not what these systems were set up to do. This could undermine the original goal of attracting qualified international students.
It also adds to the significant, ongoing degree of uncertainty within universities.
Ultimately, the most important impact on international student numbers will be from the caps, which were announced just before the May budget. It is what these will be or how they will be calculated. The legislation has been introduced to parliament and is now the subject of Senate inquiry.
There are other possible measures the government could introduce to limit problems without hurting the overall sector.
For example, the government could consider measures such as limiting student visa extensions in specific locations facing housing shortages.
This will be important if Australia is to balance overall management of its migration program with the continued success of the significant economic benefits it reaps from international students.
The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
The surprise news comes as part of a broader effort to rein in , especially among international students.
As Home Affairs Minister Clare O'Neil , the increased fee will make the migration system “fairer [and] smaller”. Education Minister Jason Clare the fee increases would also fund “important reforms” such as payments for compulsory work experience and free preparation courses for university.
How do we compare to other countries?
The fee increase means Australia will have student visa application costs way above some of its competitor countries in the international education market.
For example, student visa fees are approximately US$185 (A$277) for the and about C$150 (A$164) for . For the , it is £490 (A$932) and for it is NZD$375 (A$343).
What do universities say?
The move has been met with dismay from the university sector. , representing Australia’s top research universities (including The University of Sydney and The University of Melbourne), described it as a “blatant revenue raising move” and a “massive hit” to the A$48 billion sector.
Given the A$1,600 fee is not refundable, it may lower the pool of genuine applicants to study in Australia. This could particularly mean less students from developing countries and less cultural diversity on campuses.
It builds on other recent policy changes, including increased English language and savings requirements to study in Australia. As well as on the number of international students overall.
This has sparked concerns from groups such as that the sector is poised to suffer big financial losses, given the extent to which it relies on international student fees.
How did we get here?
The government has been clear it believes international students have returned after the reopening of borders.
After the pandemic, the former Morrison government implemented a to encourage the return of international students. These included longer visas and greater work rights.
But these policies have now been changed. As the chart below shows, visa grant rates are at record lows. This means the government is refusing more international student applications than ever before.
This is especially the case in the vocational education and training sector. According to a , this was identified as having the highest number “ ” providers. So-called “ ” enrol students who have no real intention of studying and come to Australia in order to work.
Is this a good idea?
The government’s aim to manage migration levels is to a certain extent understandable, particularly in the context of a tight housing market.
But given applications are being refused and there is an overall cap being planned, the fee increase feels like a blunt measure.
It also comes off the back of about Albanese government changes to student visas, such as “risk ratings” for institutions. The argument is, migration integrity measures are being used to drive down overall student numbers, which is not what these systems were set up to do. This could undermine the original goal of attracting qualified international students.
It also adds to the significant, ongoing degree of uncertainty within universities.
Ultimately, the most important impact on international student numbers will be from the caps, which were announced just before the May budget. It is what these will be or how they will be calculated. The legislation has been introduced to parliament and is now the subject of Senate inquiry.
There are alternatives
There are other possible measures the government could introduce to limit problems without hurting the overall sector.
For example, the government could consider measures such as limiting student visa extensions in specific locations facing housing shortages.
This will be important if Australia is to balance overall management of its migration program with the continued success of the significant economic benefits it reaps from international students.
The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.