This interview has been published by and
With almost a decade of experience in various areas of the law, looking back, was law a planned career path for you? And, what inspired you to specialise in International Commercial Arbitration from University of Miami?
Coming from a family with a strong academic tradition and a father who practiced law, pursuing a career in law felt like a natural progression. However, my true passion for the field developed during law school, particularly through my involvement in the Legal Aid Clinic, where I worked on resolving real-world disputes for underprivileged communities. This experience sparked my interest in dispute resolution, especially arbitration, as a means of achieving efficient and fair outcomes.
Specializing in International Commercial Arbitration at the University of Miami was driven by my aspiration to gain a global perspective. Miami’s reputation as a hub for international arbitration and its proximity to Latin America offered the ideal setting to study cross-border disputes. The program’s focus on both theoretical and practical aspects of arbitration, coupled with mentorship from globally renowned faculty, solidified my decision to specialize in this dynamic area of law.
From your early days at Siegfried Rivera to your current role at NHB Legal, what are the key experiences that have shaped your approach to arbitration and dispute resolution?
My journey began at Siegfried Rivera, where I gained exposure to construction law and arbitration under AAA rules, particularly involving complex commercial and construction disputes. Working in a U.S. legal framework sharpened my understanding of structured case preparation, meticulous research, and the strategic use of evidence.
At NHB Legal, I have been involved in high-stakes multi-jurisdictional disputes under various institutional frameworks IVF, DIAC and ICC. I have also represented clients in industries as diverse as construction to precious metals trading; this has further refined my ability to temper technical legal analysis with an appreciation of the client’s commercial interests. All of these experiences have uniquely influenced my approach to arbitration, with a focus on ensuring adaptable, client-based solutions that are sensitive to the various cultural differences between them.
Having spent your early years working alongside a Senior Advocate, what were the most valuable lessons you learned during that time, and what motivated you to transition into international arbitration and cross-border legal practice?
In India, I was fortunate to work with a Senior Advocate who specializes in high-value disputes for government undertakings and private parties — litigations and arbitrations, developing my skills accordingly. That gave me a good sense of how to prepare, be precise in drafting and advocate your case orally. During these formative years, I also learned how to negotiate and navigate procedural intricacies, ensuring that every case was approached strategically.
The motivation to transition into international arbitration stemmed from my desire to expand my horizons and engage with diverse legal frameworks. Cross-border disputes present unique challenges that require a blend of legal acumen, cultural awareness, and commercial pragmatism. This transition allowed me to bridge the gap between different legal systems, making my practice truly global.
Can you walk us through your professional journey as a lawyer, highlighting key milestones in both India and the U.S. being a dual qualified lawyer? How have your cross-border experiences influenced your legal philosophy and approach to advising clients in complex transactions?
My journey began in India, where I worked on domestic arbitration and litigation matters, often involving government undertakings and large corporate clients. A key milestone was securing significant arbitral awards in cases involving infrastructure and construction disputes. These experiences laid a strong foundation in arbitration and procedural law.
Transitioning to the U.S., I gained exposure to construction law and commercial arbitration, particularly under AAA and UNCITRAL rules. Drafting motions, advising on contracts, and assisting in arbitrations for high-value disputes were integral to my role. As a dual-qualified lawyer, my cross-border experiences have profoundly influenced my legal philosophy. They taught me the importance of adaptability, cultural awareness, and precision when dealing with complex, multi-jurisdictional matters. When advising clients, I ensure that my strategies are aligned not only with the legal framework but also with the client’s business objectives and cultural context.
How have your previous roles in both the US and India influenced your approach to handling disputes in the Middle East, particularly when dealing with regional legal frameworks like DIFC and DIAC?
In India, I developed a strong foundation in procedural rigor and arbitration law, while my U.S. experience introduced me to sophisticated commercial arbitration practices. These roles equipped me with a unique perspective, allowing me to adapt to the hybrid legal systems of the Middle East, such as DIFC and DIAC.
When handling disputes in this region, I leverage my ability to synthesize principles from common law and civil law systems, tailoring my approach to suit the jurisdictional and cultural nuances. This adaptability ensures effective representation in a complex and evolving legal environment.
Handling ad-hoc arbitrations and working with clients across the globe, how do you keep up with emerging trends and changes in international arbitration law, and how do you incorporate this into your practice?
Staying current with trends in international arbitration requires constant learning and engagement. I actively participate in forums like the International Council for Commercial Arbitration (ICCA) and attend global conferences to stay updated on developments such as third-party funding, technology integration, and procedural efficiency in arbitration.
In practice, I incorporate these insights by adapting strategies to reflect emerging trends. For instance, I ensure clients are aware of cost-effective procedural options, the implications of technological advancements in evidence presentation, and jurisdiction-specific updates. This proactive approach allows me to deliver solutions that are innovative and aligned with global standards.
How do you balance the demands of a high-pressure, multi-jurisdictional practice with maintaining work-life balance?
Balancing a demanding practice requires a structured approach to time management and delegation. I prioritize tasks based on urgency and impact while ensuring clear communication with my team. Personal well-being is equally important, and I make it a point to disconnect from work during family time and engage in mindfulness practices.
This balance not only sustains my productivity but also ensures I approach each case with clarity and focus. It’s about maintaining harmony between professional excellence and personal fulfilment.
Having handled several high-stakes arbitrations, what do you consider your biggest professional challenge to date, and how did you overcome it?
One of the most challenging cases I’ve handled involved a high-stakes international arbitration concerning a large-scale construction project. The dispute centered on technical claims involving structural defects, delays, and significant financial losses. The arbitration was seated in London, governed by a mix of common and civil law principles, and involved parties, witnesses, and experts from multiple jurisdictions. What stood out in this case and is common to most international arbitrations was the added complexity of navigating diverse perspectives among the parties involved. The counsel teams, witnesses, and tribunal members came from various legal traditions, cultural backgrounds, and generations, each bringing their unique approach to the case. These differences impacted everything, from procedural expectations to how evidence was perceived, and arguments were evaluated.
To overcome these challenges, I focused on collaboration and adaptability. I worked closely with technical experts to present the evidence in a way that was both legally sound and easily understood by the tribunal. I also ensured our legal strategy was flexible, adjusting arguments and advocacy styles to resonate with the tribunal’s preferences while maintaining consistency in the case’s overall narrative. Recognizing the importance of bridging cultural and generational gaps, I approached the proceedings with openness and respect for differing viewpoints, fostering an environment where constructive dialogue could thrive.
These kinds of issues are not unique to this case but are a hallmark of international arbitration. Each arbitration comes with its own set of unique challenges, shaped by the diversity of the individuals and systems involved. Successfully navigating these challenges has reinforced my belief that international arbitration requires not only legal and technical acumen but also an ability to adapt to the human elements of the process. This balance is essential to delivering results in complex, multi-jurisdictional disputes.
In your experience, what common pitfalls do contractors and developers often face in construction contracts, and how do you mitigate these issues during the contract negotiation phase?
Contractors and developers often face several pitfalls in construction contracts, primarily due to lack of clear documentation. Ambiguities around the scope of work, variations, and payment terms can lead to disputes. Unclear dispute resolution clauses are also common, making it difficult to address conflicts efficiently. Additionally, inadequate risk allocation and unclear deadlines or penalties can cause misunderstandings, especially in projects with complex timelines or unforeseen risks.
To mitigate these issues, I focus on ensuring precise documentation of all terms, including scope, timelines, and payment schedules. I also stress the importance of clear dispute resolution mechanisms, typically favouring arbitration for its efficiency. Additionally, I ensure proper risk allocation and emphasize the need for consistent documentation of any changes throughout the project. By addressing these issues upfront, we reduce the risk of future disputes and ensure smoother project delivery.
Given your broad experience across different legal domains, what advice would you give to young legal professionals who aspire to have international practice as you?
Aspiring international lawyers should build a strong foundation in core legal principles while seeking exposure to diverse legal systems. Developing cultural awareness and language skills is equally important. Networking through global platforms and engaging with mentors in the field can open doors to international opportunities.
Most importantly, approach every case with diligence, empathy, curiosity and a global perspective, understanding the unique needs of clients in cross-border contexts. The ability to adapt, learn, and deliver tailored solutions will set you apart in the dynamic world of international legal practice.
Get in touch with Somya Priyadarshini-
The post appeared first on .